ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

Articles

Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends on STEM-Based AI Chatbots in Energy Materials to Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding

Keywords

  • AI chatbot
  • Bibliometric analysis
  • Conceptual understanding
  • Energy education
  • STEM

Abstract

The integration of STEM‑based AI chatbots in energy education has emerged as a promising approach to enhance students' conceptual understanding. However, a systematic mapping of the research landscape in this interdisciplinary field is still lacking. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis to map research trends on STEM‑based AI chatbots for improving conceptual understanding in energy education. The analysis covers publications indexed in the Scopus database from 2022 to 2026. A total of 343 documents were analyzed using Bibliometrix (an R‑based package) to identify publication trends, most frequent keywords, and most relevant sources. The results show a negative annual growth rate of -16.4%, indicating a recent decline in publication output. The most frequent keywords include "engineering education", "students", "curricula", "STEM education", "teaching", "renewable energy", and "sustainable development". The most productive source is the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (52 documents). The findings confirm that the research focus is on engineering pedagogy, learner‑centered approaches, and sustainability themes. However, the decline in growth and low average citations (2.706 per document) suggest that the field is still emerging and may be shifting toward new AI technologies. This study provides a recent baseline for researchers, educators, and policymakers interested in AI‑driven STEM education for energy topics. Future research should expand data sources, investigate the causes of declining publication growth, and conduct empirical studies to validate the effectiveness of chatbot interventions.

References

  1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
  2. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Virginia: NSTApress.
  3. Davar, N. F., Dewan, M. A., & Zhang, X. (2025). AI Chatbots in Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Informations, 16(3), 235. doi:10.3390/info16030235
  4. Dewi, I. S., & Jauhariyah, M. N. (2021). Analisis Bibliometrik Implementasi Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis STEM. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 5(3), 68-387.
  5. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  6. Duy, H. T., Ngoc, C. T., & Hai, N. T. (2024). Building and using chatbots in the process of self-studying physics to improve the quality of learners' knowledge. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(4), 1165-1185. doi:10.18488/61.v12i4.3859
  7. Eliza, N., Tandililing, E., & Hidayatulah, M. M. (2022). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP FISIKA TERHADAP MINAT DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK PADA MATERI USAHA DAN ENERGI KELAS X DI SMA NEGERI 6 PONTIANAK. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(1), 43-50. doi: 10.26418/jippf.v3i1.49183
  8. Gontina, W., & Asyhar, R. (2023). DAMPAK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN IPA/FISIKA DI SEKOLAH. Silampari Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Fisika (SJPIF), 5(2), 238-250. doi:10.31540/sjpif.v5i2.2609
  9. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal Of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
  10. Hawa, N., & Nasir, A. M. (2025). Pemanfaatan AI Berbasis Chatbotdalam Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Materi Hukum Newton. PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL, 2(1), 36-41.
  11. Nee, C. K., Rahman, M. H., Yahaya, N., Ibrahim, N. H., Razak, R. A., & Sugino, C. (2023). Exploring the Trend and Potential Distribution of Chatbot in Education: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(3), 516-525. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1834
  12. Oktavianus, A. J., Naibaho, L., & Rantung, D. A. (2023). Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence pada Pembelajaran dan Asesmen di Era Digitalisasi. JURNAL KRIDATAMA SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI, 5(2), 473-486. doi:10.53863/kst.v5i02.975
  13. Putra, N., Asrizal, A., & Usmeldi, U. (2023). META-ANALISIS PENGARUH STEM PADAPEMBELAJARAN FISIKA TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEPDAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KREATIFSISWA. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(3), 228-239. doi:10.20961/inkuiri.v12i3.79314
  14. Rahmad, I. N., Tukiyo, T., Rista, L., Muhajarah, K., Karyati, Z., & Yuliyani, R. (2025). Analisis Peran Penggunaan AI Chatbot Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(3), 1726–1732. doi:https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v4i03.5497
  15. Ramandanis, D., & Xinogalos, S. (2023). Designing a Chatbot for Contemporary Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Information , 14(9), 503. doi:10.3390/info14090503
  16. Resbiantoro, G., Setiani, R., & Dwikoranto, D. (2022). A Review of Misconception in Physics: The Diagnosis, Causes, and Remediation. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 403-427. doi:10.36681/tused.2022.128
  17. Sugiyono, S. (2020). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF, KUALITATIF DAN R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA. Retrieved from https://online.anyflip.com/xobw/rfpq/mobile/index.html
  18. Wibowo, F. C., Azhari, A. Z., & Deta, U. A. (2024). Physics chatbot renewable energy (PCRE) using whatsapp auto reply for student’s construction conception and motivation. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3116(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0210198
  19. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629