ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

Articles

Development of an Environmental-Based Robotic Learning Media: Intelligent Object Sorter (ELIO) for Pre-Service Physics Teachers

Keywords

  • Educational robotics
  • Environmental
  • Physics learning
  • Sustainable Development Goals
  • Pre-service physics teachers
  • Bibliometric analysis
  • ...More
    Less

Abstract

Rapid technological advancements and the urgent need to align education with the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals require innovative, interactive approaches in environmental physics. Traditional instruction often struggles to connect abstract theoretical concepts with real-world sustainability challenges. Consequently, this study explores research trends regarding the integration of robotics, artificial intelligence, and Android technologies in education to establish a comprehensive scientific foundation for developing the Environment Learning Intelligent Object Sorter (ELIO). Employing a bibliometric approach, publication data from 2005 to 2025 were extracted from the Scopus database and analyzed to identify dominant themes, publication trajectories, and knowledge gaps. The results reveal an exponential surge in scientific production and citation impact starting in 2020. However, the findings also expose a profound geographical divide, with research heavily dominated by the United States and China. Furthermore, current literature remains predominantly anchored in technical engineering venues, lacking explicit pedagogical integration for environmental sustainability. In conclusion, this study confirms a critical gap in the holistic application of educational robotics, providing an evidence-based justification for designing the ELIO prototype. This research enriches the theoretical intersection of cyber-physical systems and physics education, while offering strategic policy insights to address global educational inequities and guiding future empirical classroom implementations.

References

  1. Ajibudiarta, R., Khoiri, N., Patonah, S., & Hayat, M. S. (2025). Potential of STEAM-SDGs Integration in Physics Learning. Unnes Science Education Journal, 14(1), 88-98.
  2. Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 9(2), 19–42.
  3. Ferrarelli, P., & Iocchi, L. (2021). Learning newtonian physics through programming robot experiments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 789–824.
  4. Fombona, J., Sáez, J.-M., & Sánchez, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence and robotics in education: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101533.
  5. Haidegger, T., Mörch, C. M., et al. (2023). Robotics - Enabler and inhibitor of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 43, 422–434.
  6. Marta, A., Zen, Z., Hidayati, A., & Rahmi, U. (2025). Development of android-based interactive learning media to improve student learning outcomes in class XII MIPA SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(5), 514–524.
  7. Matsun, M., Hadiati, S., & Saputri, D. F. (2022). Development of IoT-Based Physics Learning Media and Its Effect on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2241–2246.
  8. Nuroso, H., & Supriyadi. (2019). Environmental Physics Program: An Evaluation and Reconstruction. International Journal of Science and Society, 1(3), 45-56.
  9. Nuroso, H., Sudarmin, Sarwi, & Supriyadi. (2020). Reconstruction of Environmental Physics Learning by Integrating Ethno-technology to Actualize Superior Teacher Candidates. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 574, 257-261.
  10. Ouyang, F., & Xu, W. (2024). The effects of educational robotics in STEM education: a multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(7).
  11. Saputra, R., et al. (2021). Integration of environmental literacy in physics learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), 532–540.
  12. Sari, W. A., Artika, W., Oktari, R. S., Safrida, Rahmatan, H., & Sasaki, D. (2025). Assessing Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Competencies and Environmental Empathy in Disaster and Environment Knowledge to Support SDGs 2030. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(1), 42-58.
  13. Simanjuntak, Y. L. P., Rangkuti, M. A., & Hardianti, T. (2025). Perceptions of Physics Education Students at Universitas Negeri Medan on the Role of Physics Education in Sustainable Development Goals. Jurnal Eduscience, 12(6), 1881-1893.
  14. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
  15. Valderrama, D. A., Garzón-Velasco, M. D., & Alfonso Chaparro, L. P. (2024). Physics, Environment and Environmental Education; Perceptions from trainee Natural Science teachers. Revista Perspectivas, 9(2), 89-100.
  16. Velempini, K. (2025). Assessing the Role of Environmental Education Practices Towards the Attainment of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 17, 2043.
  17. Wang, K., Sang, G. Y., Huang, L. Z., Li, S. H., & Guo, J. W. (2023). The effectiveness of educational robots in improving learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 15(5), 4637.
  18. Wati, A. W., Sari, D. P., Sulaeman, N. F., Syam, M., & Saparini. (2024). Integrating SDGs in Climate Change Education: Insights from Pre-Service Physics Teachers. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 8(2), 86-98.
  19. Windrawan, I. G., Wibowo, F. C., & Sugihartono, I. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of STEM Robotics in Physics Education: Global Trends (2008-2024) Based on Scopus Data. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3), 462-476.
  20. Zhu, M., Liu, O., & Lee, H. (2020). The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Computers & Education, 143