Journal of Education for Sustainability and Transformation (JESTRA)

Peer-reviewed open-access journal

E-ISSN: 3125-0130

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026)
Articles

Dissemination of System Differential Learning Integrated Interactive Digital Modules Physics For Enhancing Scientific Inquiry Literacy

  • Firmanul Catur Wibowo,
  • Dina Rahmi Darman,
  • Dwi Susanti,
  • Andreas Handjoko Permana,
  • Daniel Steeven,
  • Alfian Miftahurrizki,
  • Muhammad Abd Hadi Bunyamin

Keywords

  • Scientific Inquiry Literacy
  • System Differential Learning
  • Interactive Digital Module Physics
  • Physics Inquiry-Based Learning
  • Teacher Professional Development

How to Cite

Dissemination of System Differential Learning Integrated Interactive Digital Modules Physics For Enhancing Scientific Inquiry Literacy. (2026). Journal of Education for Sustainability and Transformation, 1(3), 24-39. https://journal.serral.org/jestra/article/view/28

Abstract

The dissemination aims to improve Scientific Inquiry Literacy (SIL) Among Teachers through the dissemination and implementation of System Differential Learning (SIDILAN) and Interactive Digital Module Physics (IDMP). Dissemination is a collaboration between the Physics Learning Physics Media Development Expertise Group, Physics Education Department, Jakarta State University (UNJ), and Kolej Dato' Onn Jaafar (KDOJ) Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia. ICS is driven by the desire to implement research products developed by its team, funded by a prestigious research grant awarded by UNJ and DIKTI in 2024. The IDMP product URL: https://sites.google.com/view/learnglobalwarming101?usp=sharing and SIDILAN https://phylament.serral.org/. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia, contributed to the collaboration to develop Laboratory Environments for Inquiry Skills and served as a speaker to strengthen future cooperation in the field of dissemination. The program targets Science teachers from Indonesia and Malaysia. The of study of method Through experimental methods with 35 teachers in Jakarta, Indonesia aged 28-45 years as participants, data were collected through the SIL pretest-posttest and implementation observations. The results showed an adoption rate of 86% of the IDMP, with 75% of teachers successfully integrating it into their lesson plans. The implementation of SIDILANM and IDMP to a significant improvement in teachers’ scientific inquiry literacy, with N-Gain scores of 26%, 24%, and 21% in designing investigations, guiding inquiry, and evaluating scientific processes, respectively. The findings of this study indicate that the SIDILAN and IDMP for enhance SIL with immersive learning by providing interactive simulation. To encourage continuous practice and collaboration among teachers, future development should incorporate collaborative tools, including discussion forums and shared repositories for experimental data.

PDF

References

  1. Ait Ali, D., El Meniari, A., El Filali, S., Morabite, O., Senhaji, F., & Khabbache, H. (2023). Empirical research on technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework in health professions education: A literature review. Medical Science Educator, 33(3), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01786-z
  2. AM, M. A., Purnama, E., & Sanam, A. I. (2025). Diagnosing students’ difficulties and strategies to overcome them in physics learning. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 29(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v29i2.89736
  3. Cascone, G., Scuderi, A., Guarnaccia, P., & Timpanaro, G. (2024). Promoting innovations in agriculture: Living labs in the development of rural areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 443, 141247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141247
  4. Cer, E. (2025). Enhancing lecturer awareness of technology integration within the TPACK framework: A mixed methods study. STEM Education, 5(3), 356–382. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025018
  5. Chengere, A. M., Bono, B. D., Zinabu, S. A., & Jilo, K. W. (2025). Enhancing secondary school students’ science process skills through guided inquiry-based laboratory activities in biology. PLOS ONE, 20(4), e0320692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320692
  6. Christensen, A. A., & Jerrim, J. (2025). Professional learning communities and teacher outcomes: A cross-national analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 156, 104920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104920
  7. Chua, Y., Cooray, S., Cortes, J. P. F., Denny, P., Dupuch, S., Garbett, D. L., … Nanayakkara, S. (2024). Striving for authentic and sustained technology use in the classroom: Lessons learned from a longitudinal evaluation of a sensor-based science education platform. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(18), 5073–5086. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.03450
  8. Diego, A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1170487. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487
  9. Galimova, E. G., Sergeeva, O. V., Zheltukhina, M. R., Sokolova, N. L., Zakharova, V. L., & Drobysheva, N. N. (2025). Mobile learning in science education to improve higher-order thinking skills and communication skills: Scoping review. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1624012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1624012
  10. Ivaldi, S., Scaratti, G., & Fregnan, E. (2022). Dwelling within the fourth industrial revolution: Organizational learning for new competences, processes and work cultures. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-07-2020-0127
  11. Jibril, M., & Adedokun-Shittu, N. A. (2024). Enhancing education: A comprehensive framework for integrating technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) into teaching and learning. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijomr.v4i1.72044
  12. Kotsis, K. T., Gikopoulou, O., Patrinopoulos, M., Kapotis, E., & Kalkanis, G. T. (2025). The new Greek inquiry-based learning science curriculum for primary education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 5(3), em083. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/16846
  13. Lakka, I., Zafeiropoulos, V., & Leisos, A. (2023). Online virtual reality-based vs. face-to-face physics laboratory: A case study in distance learning science curriculum. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1083. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111083
  14. Liu, J., Aziku, M., Qiang, F., et al. (2024). Leveraging professional learning communities in linking digital professional development and instructional integration: Evidence from 16,072 STEM teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00513-3
  15. Machado, C., & Nahar, L. (2023). Influence of a multiphase inquiry-based learning project on students’ science literacy. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 9(3), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.1331483
  16. McKie, K. (2024). Collaboration counts: Sustained success in professional learning communities. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 24, 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-025-00367-z
  17. Morris, D. L. (2025). Rethinking science education practices: Shifting from investigation-centric to comprehensive inquiry-based instruction. Education Sciences, 15(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010073
  18. Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2023). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: A case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00110A
  19. Parrales-Bravo, F., Tolozano-Benites, R., Jadán-Guerrero, J., Vasquez-Cevallos, L., & Gómez-Rodríguez, V. (2026). From virtual worlds to real-world equity: A scoping review of the metaverse as computer-assisted learning for STEM competencies. Computers, 15(4), 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15040229
  20. Pols, C. F. J., Dekkers, P. J. J. M., & De Vries, M. J. (2022). Defining and assessing understandings of evidence with the assessment rubric for physics inquiry: Towards integration of argumentation and inquiry. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010111
  21. Pondee, P., Panjaburee, P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2021). Preservice science teachers’ emerging pedagogy of mobile game integration: A tale of two cohorts improvement study. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00152-0
  22. Rusdiyana, R., Indriyanti, D. R., Hartono, H., & Isnaeni, W. (2024). The application of online science-based inquiry learning in primary schools. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(2), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.016
  23. Sanzana, M. R., Abdulrazic, M. O. M., Wong, J. Y., Karunagharan, J. K., & Chia, J. (2024). Gamified virtual labs: Shifting from physical environments for low-risk interactive learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(1), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2022-0281
  24. Septyowaty, R., Azizahwati, & Syafii, M. (2023). Application of the guided inquiry model to improve psychomotor skills and interest in learning physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8106–8113. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4434
  25. Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N., Abu-Tineh, A., et al. (2024). Teacher leadership and virtual communities: Unpacking teacher agency and distributed leadership. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 15025–15042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12446-5
  26. Shintya, R. E., Harahap, S. A. N., Suhandi, A., & Sari, I. M. (2025). Exploring Scientific Inquiry Literacy among physics teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(2), 1149–1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v26i2.pp1149-1172
  27. Shivolo, T., Kamina, C. U., Nembenge, G., Nangutuwala, M. M., & Simasiku, F. S. (2024). Evaluating the teaching of physical science practical work at a selected resource-constrained secondary school in Rundu Circuit, Kavango East Region. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v1i2.14
  28. Sliwka, A., Klopsch, B., Beigel, J., & Tung, L. (2024). Transformational leadership for deeper learning: Shaping innovative school practices for enhanced learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2023-0049
  29. Susilawati, A., & Dari, U. (2026). Deep approach to learning through constructivism: Enhancing science process skills and scientific attitudes for SDG 4 quality education in physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 12(2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i2.13750
  30. Tokatlidis, C., Tselegkaridis, S., Rapti, S., Sapounidis, T., & Papakostas, D. (2024). Hands-on and virtual laboratories in electronic circuits learning—Knowledge and skills acquisition. Information, 15(11), 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110672
  31. Twizeyimana, E., Shyiramunda, T., Dufitumukiza, B., & Niyitegeka, G. (2024). Teaching and learning science as inquiry: An outlook of teachers in science education. SN Social Sciences, 4(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00846-4
  32. Utaminingsih, S., Fajrie, N., Bamiro, N. B., & Azman, M. N. A. (2023). Teachers and students perception of technology and sustainable adoption framework in the pedagogical process: A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(12), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.9
  33. Vidak, A., Movre Šapić, I., Mešić, V., & Gomzi, V. (2023). Augmented reality technology in teaching about physics: A systematic review of opportunities and challenges. European Journal of Physics, 45(2), 023002. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.18392
  34. Walker, K. I., & Nouri, N. (2025). Phenomenon-based learning and storylines in K-12 science education: A systematic review of current research, implementation, and future directions. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1648234. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1648234
  35. Wang, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). Understanding teachers’ online professional learning: A “community of inquiry” perspective on the role of Chinese middle school teachers’ sense of self-efficacy, and online learning achievement. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16932

Information

Visitor

Flag Counter